Obedience, revisited

I've been thinking over obedience lately. I think it gets a bad rap. We tend to associate obedience with controlling. As a matter of fact, I've known people to use that very misconception as an excuse for being disobedient.

In the early stages of a relationship, obedience often comes with a significant measure of obedience. For example, when I first started in my current job, I did a lot of exactly what I was told. I complied a lot. That's how I learned. It's how I earned the trust of the people I serve. 

After a while, I began asking if I could change something. When several of those worked out (and a few didn't), they began asking for input. Our relationship grew based on trust. Obedience plays a key role in establishing trust. The goal of obedience was and always is a deepening relationship.

God established this early on. The very first books in the Bible spell out a lot of rules. In the early stages of His relationship with us, obedience involved a large degree of control - compliance. But it doesn't stay there. The people considered heroes in the Bible all showed faith. Obedience established trust. Trust brought a deeper relationship.

Obedience in marriage is not about control. It's about communication. It establishes roles. A husband bears responsibility for the decisions he makes. God clearly expects those decisions to involve sacrifice on his part, place his family's needs above his own, and fall in line with God's own principles.

A wife can and should give input to her husband. She has an obligation to persuade him. That takes work learning his style, lingo, and preferences. Manipulation occurs when he's deceived about why. Persuading your husband to move in a direction God asks = very good. Saying that just to get your own way = very bad. Do you understand your own motivations that well?

The goal is always trust. When practiced over many years, the lines become blurred. That's okay. That's what should happen. Proverbs 31 describes a desirable wife as one who conducts business independently, but in coordination with her husband. Rather than control, her obedience led to greater responsibility and a deeper relationship. 

God starts us out on the easy stuff - just like I did with my kids. As we mature through out obedience, He gives us more responsibility and more complex situations. And once you think you've got it, blam! He'll hit you with something that doesn't fit anything you think you understand. There is always more.

Obedience is not training. Dog's are trained. People obey. Obedience comes from the obedient person. Training comes from the master. They're backwards of each other. Training makes the dog subservient. Obedience elevates your stature. Sounds weird, right? How can doing what someone else says make me more? Because every relationship has 3 people - you, me, and God.

Should a wife express her opinion, desires, and ideas? Absolutely. Obedience merely describes the how, not the what. It's how you approach your husband, boss, pastor, God, etc.. That you should approach him is never the question.

Does that make sense? Am I rationalizing? I don't know. I need to learn a little more.

Connection

 I'm struggling with a mix of emotions right now. And they're all related to a couple of things that happened recently.

A few weeks ago, one of my elementary school teachers was arrested. It might be valid, and it might be a false accusation. Honestly, I have no idea. My point is that today I remembered having a dream about being in elementary school again. I saw the gym where we waited for school to start in the winter. Even walked through it in my dream. Then a friend sent me the news clipping about this whole scandal. I didn't make the connection until today.

I say this because something similar happened this week. I started out in a funk this week. Irritated at every little thing. And a vague feeling of powerlessness. I have been wracking my brain (and praying) about why. Today, my ex e-mails me. She gave my youngest daughter a phone and set up an second Google account.

My daughter has had an Android tablet for several years. She has history, e-mail, and content already under a Google account. My ex has received, accepted, and declined appointments for years that went to my daughter's account. Yet the ex set up a brand new one. Threw all of the history and purchases out the window. (Sorry, I'm still mad. It bleeds through.)

That was all in motion earlier this week - during the funk. I think my feelings were related to those actions. Spiritually, I felt my ex's hurtful actions.

My friend at work calls us empaths. We get along so well because we understand each other. I think empathy means more than just emotions. I think it's more spiritual. It expresses itself through emotions. Empathy may come through the part of the brain that deals with our own emotions. Makes sense. I re-use subroutines all the time.

I don't understand the mechanism. Do we all have this? Is it part of our spiritual being? Is it God speaking, guiding? Preparing me for something that's coming. Is it because the spiritual realm isn't constrained by time. And I'm feeling spiritual changes before they become realized in the physical world? Is this what we lose when we die to the spirit?

I think God does use this mechanism to speak. I think He uses empathy to the extent the person feels empathy. Empathy is not a measure of connection with Him. Not all empaths live in the Spirit. And not everyone in the Spirit has the same empathic ability. Like everything else, I think God created me with a unique combination and tailors our relationship that way.

Concrete Application

Ever heard the justification I'm not hurting anyone but myself? I'm here to say that's a lie. I am hurt, whether you meant that or not. I am hurt because I feel it. You can't change that. You can't stop it. You can't control it. When I connect with someone, their feelings invade my own - like this week.

You are hurting someone. I spent two decades married to this woman who told me every day that her sin is my fault. My oldest two daughters hurt me rather than feel remorse or shame. An old "friend" who told me I was wrong because I didn't obey her social rules on Facebook - just because she didn't like the facts in what I said. I am surrounded by people who impose their feelings on me. Define right and wrong on their feelings. Yet have no regard whatsoever for mine.

I'm a thinker. I internalize everything. I think that's selfish. Placing ones self at the center of the universe - everything revolves around your feelings. But don't point that out.

A scorpion always stings. And the emperor has no clothes. People are messy. I'm no exception.

Power is not abuse

I find it ironic how God works in themes. I try working something out. Then all of sudden things happen right along that very subject. Yes, a little bit of it comes from my own perception (or lack thereof). Still, other events independent of me coincide just perfectly. It's not so much God manipulating events around me. It's Him leading me in preparation of upcoming events.

Either way, I'm writing today about obedience - specifically, obedience between husbands and wives. 

We had a men's gathering for church yesterday morning. The topic was our relationship with women in the church as sisters. As one point in that whole lesson, the speaker touched on marriage - husbands and wives. I like his take that marriage is an anamoly. It is one woman with whom our relationship is different. And, of course, this touched on the subject of authority in marriage.

Full disclosure, I was a little disappointed. It seemed to follow the theme of our day - men exercising power are abusive. I understand why the speaker has this point of view as he has heard and lived these stories. It strikes me as incomplete. My experience with an abusive wife is much different. So I struggle with where does a balanced view lie.

Men, in their abuse, tend toward a more aggresive posture. Aggression is easily seen and related with. It pulls on the heart strings. We suddenly forget about questions of right and wrong. Someone is hurt. We need to save them. We have replaced right and wrong with feeling good. We have been manipulated, moved from focussing on Jesus into focussing on our pain (aka sympathy).

My point is, right and wrong come from God. Our relationship with Him, through His Son, Jesus, is the only real definition for right/wrong. If God says this woman is abused, help her, you should. If God says deal with her sin first, then you should do that. But first and foremost, you need to talk with God. What you see is incomplete. A picture painted by the people directly involved. And that picture has parts of them in it. God has the whole picture.

Getting back to the topic at hand... God gave wives (not women, wives) the responsibility to submit to their husbands. I think of it in terms of a business. Someone yesterday made the point that in Biblical times, the family was the economic unit. All businesses were inherently family businesses. In that vein, in our business, I submit to my boss. I run new ideas by her. I give her the authority to make decisions. She knows more about the current state and direction of the business than I do.

In turn, my boss and I have worked together for many years now. She trusts my recommendations. Listens to my opinions. And even sometimes lets me make decisions. I trust that she wants to keep the business open and paychecks flowing, serve our clients, and help everyone on our team grow. We built a relationship. And that's the key - obedience is about building the relationship. Obedience is not the goal. Obedience is the first step. And as the relationship matures, the nature of obedience changes.

We are all sinners - men and women alike. Men can abuse their wives submission. Wives can abuse their husbands authority/responsibility. Someone married for 30 years will and should have a very different relationship than when they got married. 

Responsibility

 Couple of Sundays ago, the pastor said authority and responsibility are the same thing. I remember this, because in my head I always phrased it authority and responsibility are two sides of the same coin. And something occurred to me on a walk. This is part of the mechanism to forgive our sin.

I love to figure out how things work. So yes, I think about how one person dying 2,000 years ago can be enough to cover all the things wrong with me, let alone all of the other people too. Jesus told His disciples all authority in heaven and on earth is given to me. That's how He can also accept responsibility for our sin. Jesus was in charge. If He has the authority, then He has also chosen to accept the responsibility. 

That blows my mind. This is a true leader. God gave Jesus authority so that Jesus could take the responsibility. Not just responsibility for what I do wrong. Responsibility for fixing it. So He has the authority and means to fix the world. And accepted the job of doing so.

Yes - fix the world. He starts with us. A little bit at a time. Over time. Preparing us for the real fix. The one that's coming.

Sorry, going down a rabbit trail. Back to the point. Jesus' authority provides the means for His taking the responsibility for me. And because He takes that, I don't need to worry. The responsibility for being good no longer falls on my shoulders. I still want to be good. Not because I have to. Because that's the kind of person I want to be my friend. Gratitude. 

Guilt

Watched season 14, episode 9 of Grey's Anatomy. In this episode, an abusive husband comes back to haunt the Jo Wilson character. I really dislike those kind of story lines. It's who Renee wanted me to be. She spent many years telling me that I was that person.

Now, after 20 years of being told in every discussion that I was abusive, I do get angry. I get very angry and I lash out at Renee. Sadly, lashing out is also the only way to get information from her. I feel trapped between a rock and a hard place.

The worst part, even talking about can be passed off as denial. Who is going to believe that a wife is gaslighting her husband? And if it hurts me, if I respond in any way, then it merely confirms the lie - I'm abusive. I can't feel. I can't be angry. Renee only responds to anger.

I wish I had the patience Jesus displayed. I don't. So I listen to Him. I tell Him. And then I do something, knowing that sometimes I'll be right (even if it's mean) and He'll testify on my behalf when I'm not. I belong to Him. He knows the truth, even the ugly parts. I trust Him.

"Excuse" me

 Today's topic is excuses versus explanations. I'm sure I looked weird walking around the neighborhood muttering to myself about this one.

Excuses - good ones - sound like explanations. It makes them hard to spot - especially if you tend to giving people the benefit of the doubt. Excuses are reasons to quit. I think of them like witchcraft - magic words to get what you want. Excuses are selfish, always.

Explanations bring you closer to a resolution. Explanations acknowledge facts. Explanations never include motivation. An explanation is not a destination. It is a step towards your goal of restoration - restoring a relationship that you damaged.

Excuses assume forgiveness. Excuses are about control - control through manipulation. Explanations move to the next step - how do I not do this again. What do I do next so that I move away from what was wrong?

This tripped me up about repentance. Turning away doesn't mean stopping yourself from ever doing it again. We can't. Our sinful nature has too much power right now. It does mean that I can do something. A small step. Small steps become larger steps. Explanations are mindfulness. Excuses are denial.

Excuses prevent forgiveness. Excuses justify what you do. If you're justified, then no forgiveness needed. In contrast, when we're justified through forgiveness, we can both acknowledge that we were wrong and restore the relationship. Excuses end relationships. Forgiveness builds them.

Forgiveness allows the other person an opportunity for generosity. They shine. Their character stands out. Excuses make it all about me. They deprive the other person of this opportunity and tells them that they're wrong for their own feelings about what I did. Excuses don't just steal an opportunity. They drive the wedge deeper by compounding the wrong.

Ever heard Dave Ramsey explain compound interest? It's an amazing concept. Over long periods of time, compound interest turns smaller sums of money into larger. Great news for retirement! When I say excuses compound the wrong, I'm thinking the same thing - only bad. Compound interest on a debt will overwhelm you. That kind of bad.

Explanations are extremely valuable. They help you learn about yourself or a friend. Explanations with forgiveness can restore broken relationships. Excuses stop everything in their tracks. Excuses kill. Excuses shut down the conversation. What are your favorite excuses?

Dead Reckoning

 I think too much when I walk. Lately, I've been thinking about forgiveness and repentance. Both involve dying to the flesh, as Paul describes it. Today, my attention focused on the word dying.

Repentance is death. What do we do when someone close to us dies? We grieve. Hopefully by now you've heard the 5 stages of grief: denial, anger, bargaining, depression, and acceptance. I submit that repentance is stage 5 - acceptance.

Repentance

Repentance happens when we accept the truth - I am wrong. We pass through all 5 of these of these stages. Deny that it was wrong. There is no right and wrong. What I did wasn't wrong. And even the blatant "I didn't do it." Delusion, agnosticism, and atheism can be forms of denial.

Anger may attack, blame, or say "you do it too". Bargaining might be promises, excuses, and even accusations. Anything that manipulates the injured party into compromising on repentance. Personally, I find this stage the most difficult to perceive. I have a natural tendency to give people the benefit of the doubt. It makes me vulnerable to many forms of bargaining without realizing. This stage may often look or feel like acceptance. The difference is often only in your heart.

I don't have anything to say about the depression stage.

Acceptance means facing the truth. Jesus taught that behavior comes from the heart. Truth means both consequences and the state of your heart. Accepting the truth of who you are and how that affects the world and people around you. Once you accept the truth, you then accept the responsibility. That breeds repentance. 

Repentance is about your character.

Forgiveness

Ever heard the phrase "forgive and forget"? Or the Psalm where David says that God's forgiveness pushes away our sins "as far as the east is from the west". Forgiveness is not pretending that something never happened. Forgiveness is accepting the cost even though it isn't yours. Forgiveness is about their character (the injured party).

God's forgiveness speaks volumes about His character. That's why it doesn't, in any way, depend on us. That's why bargaining is so dangerous.

Negotiation occurs between equals. By bargaining, the person who did the wrong elevates themselves. The debtor is slave to the lender. Mentally, when bargaining, we view ourselves as equal, not in debt. Not accepting responsibility for our debt.

Revisited

I stepped away for a couple of days after writing that first part. This part happened in the shower. Really, this is my idle time. 

Acceptance is not repentance. Acceptance of the truth is a precursor to repentance. 

A co-worker explained the meaning of dead reckoning. It's a nautical term. The navigator used landmarks and written descriptions to determine where on the coast the ship landed. Long before GPS, a ship headed out in the general direction. Stars and moon ensured they stayed going the right way. But they're imprecise. The chances of following a straight line are pretty much zero. Land fall rarely happened exactly at the port. The navigator used landmarks to identify where the ship was relative to the port they wanted.

Grief is like sailing across the ocean - a long journey across a featureless landscape. A small error in aim makes for a huge difference in destination. We can accept the wrong thing. We're off course. We have veered away from the truth.

God is truth. That's why it is so important that He walk through grief with us. Jesus experienced this same cycle of grief. Jesus was always with God. He fully accepted God's truth. He fully accepted God's grace.

Jesus took the responsibility, the obligation, of our debt to God - the damage we cause His universe - completely believing in the character of God. Jesus knew He would die. He knew God would raise Him from the dead. Because He knew that is who God is. Jesus is our example of what it looks like to accept God's grace. Jesus took responsibility for billions without ever doubting His future. Rather than demand life on His own merit, Jesus allowed God to exercise His character and generously forgive. Jesus truly understood and kept sight of God's character above His own. That blows my mind!

When I veer off course, I start to depend on my character instead of God's. We accept a lie. The lie usually comes in the early stages - denial, anger, bargaining. Sometimes depression and probably rarer in acceptance. But the lie drives us off course. And our acceptance puts us in the wrong place entirely.

This all gave new meaning to the phrase accept me for who I am. That's one of the lies. And a fairly common one. It really means accept me for who I say that I am in spite of all the evidence to the contrary. It's not acceptance at all. It's pretend. Delusion, if you will. For some reason, we like to think that if enough people share a delusion then it becomes real.

Repentance follows when we accept the truth of who we are - really are. And that' hard. Really hard.

One Flesh

Today is another what if post. A question popped into my head while reading Why Does God Care Who I Sleep With? - why does Genesis say one flesh? "...and they shall become one flesh." (Genesis 2:24)

The passage doesn't say "two spirits become one". Flesh submits to the spirit. The spirit interacts with the universe around us - creation - through flesh. Two spirits acting as one flesh are two spirits affecting creation in synch. Their interaction, subduing, and shaping of the universe reflects a harmony as if one alone were working.

Jesus often says I and the Father are One. In this train of thought, does becoming one flesh paint a picture of Jesus' relationship with God? He and His Father work together so closely it looks like one acting alone. Their impact on the universe is completely synchronized. The Bible uses marriage as an image for Christ's relationship with His church. Christ relationship with us reflects His relationship with His Father. What if marriage was always the picture of our relationship with God?

The idea that two people affect the universe in unison reflects the image of how we and God affect the universe in unison - or how we were supposed to. Naturally, in this relationship, we submit to God. God knows every sub-atomic particle floating through the universe over all of time. He has a much better picture than I do. Does this mean that if Adam never sinned, wives still submit to husbands?

I'm not being trivial. Sin brought death because it reverted us into our flesh. The law of entropy takes over. Everything breaks down. Another consequence, God told Eve that Adam will rule over her and her desire would be for him. The tradition of husband as head of the family originates from there. Did God make what was always true clear because He knew we would fight? If we can't be in harmony with Him, how can we be in harmony with each other?

Because of the fall, the submitter and the submitted to are both imperfect. Even if we were perfect, doesn't one spirit still submit to the other in order to maintain harmony? We submit to God, and would submit to God. Jesus submitted to God, His Father. Why would marriage - or any other human institution - be different?

So, yeah, this is the stuff banging around in my brain today. What do you think?

Honor and Acceptance

To Deanna and Lucy...

I was reading Psalms 23 this morning. Around verse 5, it says you prepare a feast for in the presence of my enemies. You honor me by anointing my head with oil. This reminded me of Proverbs which talks about letting God be the one to honor us, not ourselves.

To me, Psalms 23 paints a picture of the ideal working conditions - peace, soft background noise, lack of danger. I can focus on what I need to do, not the rest of the world around me. Rod and staff are instruments that a shepherd uses on his own sheep, to lead them away from danger or wrong trails. They represent discipline as love, not control. Easy and gentle.

Then honor. Then eternity. The Psalm begins with God setting the circumstances, showing us where to go, protecting us as He goes too, followed by honor, esteem or acceptance, and eternity. This is life. And the one common thread is God.

Success does not come from money, education, or even trying hard enough. Success comes solely and entirely from God. Yes, we work. I work. I work hard. I make a conscious effort to be excellent at whatever I do. Sometimes I hit a home run. Others, well, tapping the ball is a victory. 

God not only knows how to pitch soft balls for home runs, He also amplifies that tiny tap so that it accomplishes something more. Success always comes from God. Live your lives for Him, and He will be proud of You. The God who made an entire universe, set planets in motion, and sub-atomic particles hurtling through space, will be proud of you.

Remarkable

Today's post is a product review. Why? Because I happen to really like this product. The company will never know. I bought the Remarkable myself.

Yes, that's really the name - Remarkable. Remarkable makes a tablet to replace pen and paper. The Remarkable is not a tablet like Android or iPad. It is truly a replacement for pen and paper.

My Opinion

I love my Remarkable. I live with notepad and pen. Taking notes helps me process information and learn new things. The act of summarizing forces me to understand what I'm hearing. In school, I used outlines. Now I use a bullets, indenting related sub-points. Same structure, less thinking. And off topic. Pen and paper work well for me.

The Remarkable is unobtrusive. It has a thin profile, like an actual notepad. No computer screen interfering with my view of the other person. The Remarkable lies flat, like a notepad. 

The pen flows easily over the writing surface. It really feels like writing on paper. The screen is not glossy, like a glass screen. That also means it doesn't wash out in sunlight. 

The Technology

The Remarkable uses e-ink, similar to Amazon's Kindle. E-ink consumes a lot less power, giving the tablet really great battery life. And e-ink makes the tablet easy to read in bright lighting conditions (like sunlight). On the other hand, it is harder to read in the dark, just like normal pen and paper.

The Remarkable has one button - power. The button brings the tablet in and out of sleep mode. The rest of the controls are on screen. A simple dial toggles the sidebar. I alternate between leaving the sidebar open and hiding it. Depends on the notebook. Sometimes I want the extra space. Others, I like the convenience. Either way, switching between them is simple, intuitive.

Negatives

You swipe left or right to turn pages. I have trouble. It's as if the Remarkable doesn't register my swipe. Eventually it will, if I just keep trying. But the delay is annoying when it doesn't work the first time.

Also, I highly recommend purchasing the pen with the eraser. You can still erase with the cheaper pen. It takes more click. The eraser on the back is absolutely perfect for quick corrections or changes. I find tapping works better than rubbing.

Positives

The Remarkable is thin like a real notepad. It comes with templates to simulate lined paper, graph paper, planners, and others. 

The Remarkable supports layers. I can expand the built in templates using layers. When you're in a layer, you can't erase the text in another layer. I can draw over their built-in template, then add a new layer for text that's going to change. You can edit other layers, so it's not permanent. But it helps protect me from myself. My eye hand coordination isn't the best. 

How I use it

The Remarkable has completely replaced paper notepads for me. It's also replaced my electronic journals.

I always kept two journals - a bullet journal and morning pages. The Remarkable helps me keep my bullet journal more concise. I tend to write, as you may have noticed. I kept meeting notes in the journal. Ordered tasks in the order I thought I should do them. And used it as a place to keep notes.

Because the Remarkable works like pen and paper, I find myself not controlling the journal as much. I don't worry about order, for example. I simply review my tasks after each one. Less stress. And because the items may be out of order, I find myself keeping fewer useless notes. The Remarkable works against my impulse to structure things - in a good way. I go over board on structure. The tablet makes those bad habits more expensive, less palatable. 

I've written about morning pages before. And I had been typing them for years. I could type sitting comfortably. And frankly, I hate writing by hand. The Remarkable hasn't really changed that. It has made writing by hand a little cooler. Never underestimate the allure of a new toy. So I find myself writing morning pages by hand. I have to say, it doesn't really make a difference to me.

The Remarkable is easier to write on than paper notepads. I can sit outside, or on the couch. Notepads bend too easily. I always needed something rigid underneath. The tablet provides a naturally smooth, hard surface for writing. Convenient.

Conclusion

A Remarkable tablet is expensive. If the price ever approaches $200 total, I think they could really start replacing paper notepads on a large scale. And I'm very glad that I bought mine.

The Remarkable does one thing, and does it well - replace paper and pen. If that appeals to you, then I highly recommend you look at the Remarkable 2. 

Starving

 I read a couple of things and would like to share them. Have you ever read something, and someone's name just pops into your head? I never really know why. So I chalk it up to God's leading. The gentle nudges He gives to let me be a part of His work.

The first one came from Proverbs 27. The chapter talks about interpersonal relationships. And a few verses in, the author drops this - A person who is full refuses honey, but even bitter food tastes sweet to the hungry. Why can we complain about someone and yet keep going right back to them? This is why - we're hungry. And even a bitter relationship tastes sweet.

I was wondering how this tied in with what I read today - Matthew chapter 6. A light bulb just went off while writing this. The theme of Jesus' talk is look at God. Long for things from heaven - long term spiritual health. Let the temporal things take care of themselves. No, that's not quite right. Rather let God take care of the temporal things.

Several times, Jesus says they have received their reward. He's talking about people who do things to impress other people. Jesus tells those listening that they should do impressive things in secret. He's not saying hide away. He's saying that our motivation is God's praise, not the recipients or people watching.

This is hard. I struggle all the time. It feels good when people tell you that you're doing a good job. And those emotions love to just run wild. I have to make a conscious effort to bring myself back to God's way. It's ironic, because God will ask other people to praise and encourage us. That's part of the mechanism that He uses. The hard part for me is letting initiate it, not me.

Okay, back to the tie-in. When our value comes from other people, eventually we starve for more. And to a hungry person, even bitter, rotten relationships taste sweet - as long as I get what I want. And there's the rub. When my value comes from God, an eternal, never sleeping, never failing God, then I'm always full. I have the luxury of picking my relationships. I choose, rather than being driven.

There are a lot of different directions to go with this. I've already deleted 3 paragraphs. I think this is a good place to stop. So what do you think about all this? 

COVID Vaccine

 Followed a link on Facebook to the OpenVAERS site for COVID data. The math nerd in me started crunching some numbers.

That site shows 11,249 reports of adverse effects. 501 deaths. Assuming the site is limited to the United States, I found another site estimating the vaccination progress. It estimates 39,000,000 vaccines given in the United States. Divide 11,249 by 39,000,000 and you get a 0.029% rate of adverse effects. 501 deaths divided by 39,000,000 gives us a death rate of 0.001%.

Likewise, this Google search reported 27,000,000 cases of COVID in the United States with 463,000 deaths. Divide 463,000 by 27,000,000 and you calculate a 1.71% death rate for the virus. 

Personal Story

Since this is my blog, I'm going to share my experience. I have received both doses of the vaccine. And I reacted to both, the day after. I felt achy, run down, and flushed. Both times, all symptoms disappeared after one day.

From what I read, these symptoms are far milder than actually catching COVID. In my life, with my health and body, I consider this a worthwhile trade.

Haircut

 As I cut my hair today, I was thinking about the difference between men and women. Well, more precisely, my preferences about hair. I cut my hair short. Why? I like it that way. It gets greasy, thick, and when it gets long, I get distracted by the part. Since it's just me, I cut it the way I like. Vania seems to like rubbing my head when my hair is short too.

When my girls were little, I wanted them to have long hair. This is what caught my interest - I find women's long hair attractive, and my own long hair annoying. The difference is interesting, to me anyway.

Growing up, my school had policies around length of hair. Boys couldn't be too long nor girls too short. Yes, this probably influenced my preferences. Well, at least my preferences about my hair. Being a very habitual person (or obsessive, but let's not split hairs), I got trained by repetition to feel comfortable with short hair.

Finding long hair attractive is entirely a personal preference. My mother sported both styles, at different periods in her life. My grandmother had shorter hair, which she liked to keep in a perm. I say that because it doesn't seem to be related to women that I knew growing up. Like having a favorite color, I just like it. There is no reason.

What happened when they asked to get their hair cut? Believe it or not, I thought about that a lot, even before they asked. I took this stance - I told them that I prefer long hair. I would like them to have long hair. But I intentionally did not come right out and say no. Why? Because I wanted them to make their own decisions.

Sure, when they were young, we never gave them the option. As they got older and became teenagers, they had to start making their own decisions. And we won't talk the one daughter who had a knot so big they had to cut her hair just to get it out. Totally different.

This reminded me of a passage in John where Jesus says, kind of in passing, that His Father gave Jesus control over His life. It was Jesus's decision to give it away or keep it. God did not force Jesus to die on a cross. God did not command it. God gave Jesus not only the option, but also the power to not die. Yet Jesus acted as if this were a matter of obedience.

God explained His story. Asked His Son to play a part in that story. And Jesus saw this as obedience. Far too often we equate obedience with authority and control. Jesus had control the entire time. He obeyed because He wanted to. This is maturity. We don't obey God because He's some old man in the sky who's going to hurt me at the slightest mis-step. I obey God because He has repeatedly demonstrated that despite my rebellious nature, He does everything He can for my good. Or put in simple terms - He loves me.

There's a bunch of other stuff bouncing around. I think I'll end here though. This is weird enough just from a haircut.